About my work
An important part of my work is focused on sculpture materials. I am closely linked with earth and peat, and their potential has lately resulted in the creation of items intended to attain a physical experience through these materials. That is why I only consider an artwork as accomplished when it is completed by the human body, going as far as regarding many items as instruments, with special characteristics that confer them the possibility of being used.
Therefore, my interest in completing an artwork and turning it into a unique and definite item regards two different aspects. On the one hand, it takes into account the task, the process itself -as my latest work shows, through a serial, systematic approach, in which formal repetition highlights this processual aspect in the creative and constructive realm. On the other hand, it considers the design of "habitable" places, taking the human body as a measure and specifying how to arrange the items to be used. This is how I conscientiously experience two materials: the body and the earth.
This instrumental character of my works adds a new condition to them. Every action emphasizes the process: "There is no event without practice, there is no situation without repetition. What is imposed as the best for us must be repeated, elaborated and transformed into what we subjectively want. (...) This aesthetics of the event creates the idea of art as a practice: (...) what is most important in stoic thinking is not the artwork but its practice, that is, the processual moment that leads towards it, the productive movement that creates it" (Mario Perniola, L'arte e la sua ombra, 2000). Being completed by the action of using the items establishes a private relationship with the qualities of their materials. These qualities have a bearing on the "user" and create a tension -as Hölderlin called it-, and so intensify conscience.
About the construction of columns
There are two essential aspects I am interested in when building columns. Firstly, their support, instability, and the body as a base. Secondly, intrusion in spaces, empathic fusion between floor and ceiling, and coexistence as a process to develop a sense of belonging.
I carefully consider the instability that the lack of base transmits to the pillars. When I resort to a large number of columns as symbolic elements of instability, I present them without a base, turning this main idea of sustainability into an expression of absurdity and discouragement. I also interpret columns as elements of support. For example, I fix them to the ceiling and leave them hanging on the floor, leaving an exact space -corresponding to their base- for their use. The earth pillars act as the seat of the artwork that will be fulfilled only when a man physically occupies it. In this way, it becomes the base of the columns, responsible for their own stability. Base and column make up an impossible whole, and ironically, every time the body withdraws from its status as a base, instability will be re-established, revealing a frail firmness. Only systematic coexistence, considered as the process that establishes a relationship between dwelling and the aforementioned use, succeeds in intensifying conscience and the sense of belonging.
CARLOS RODRÍGUEZ-MÉNDEZ
Vigo, March 2005